» 美印網(wǎng)友評(píng)論：中國正在建造第二艘航母
美印網(wǎng)民評(píng)論：中國正在建造第二艘航母。三泰虎1月19日譯文，據(jù)報(bào)道，中國開始建造擬建4艘航母中德第二艘。這艘航母正在東北港口大連建造，預(yù)計(jì)6年時(shí)間完工。中國第一艘航母遼寧號(hào)航母于 2012年9月完工，是該國日益增長軍事力量中一個(gè)標(biāo)志性里程碑。另外兩艘航母也在準(zhǔn)備中，這一力量投送與北京恪守武裝自衛(wèi)的政策發(fā)生矛盾。
譯文來源：三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com
外文標(biāo)題：China starts building second aircraft carrier: media
外文地址：http://news.yahoo.com/china-starts-building-second-aircraft-carrier-media-164600112.html
China has started constructing the second of four planned aircraft carriers, a top government official said according to media reports on Saturday.
The ship is under construction in the northeastern port of Dalian and will take six years to build, the reports said quoting Wang Min, Communist Party chief for Dalian's Liaoning province.
The country's first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, was completed in September 2012 in a symbolic milestone for the country's increasingly muscular military.
據(jù)媒體周六報(bào)道，某位政府高官表示，中國開始建造擬建4艘航母中的第二艘。
這艘航母正在東北港口大連建造，預(yù)計(jì)6年時(shí)間完工。
中國第一艘航母遼寧號(hào)航母于2012年9月完工，是該國日益增長軍事力量中一個(gè)標(biāo)志性里程碑。
Another two are in the pipeline, according to Wang, in a projection of power that could be seen as contradicting Beijing's long-stated policy of arming itself strictly for self-defence.
When the Liaoning went into service, Beijing and Tokyo were locked in a territorial row over the Japanese-controlled Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea which China also claims and calls the Diaoyus.
The row continues to simmer, along with other sovereignty disputes with the Philippines and Vietnam.
另外兩艘航母也在準(zhǔn)備中，這一力量投送與北京恪守武裝自衛(wèi)的政策發(fā)生矛盾。
遼寧號(hào)服役之際，北京和東京正就日本控制的尖閣島發(fā)生領(lǐng)土爭端，中國也對(duì)該島嶼聲張主權(quán)，并稱之為釣魚島。
爭議持續(xù)發(fā)酵，中國同時(shí)還與菲律賓和越南發(fā)生領(lǐng)土糾紛。
以下是美國網(wǎng)友的評(píng)論：
譯文來源：三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/china-starts-building-second-aircraft-carrier-media.html
TEA Time
The Chinese don't need aircraft carriers to attack the US, they have Wal-Mart and Obama.
中國人不需要航母來向美國發(fā)起進(jìn)攻，他們有沃爾瑪和奧巴馬就可以。
Mirmingi
Whatever people say here, there won't be a war between america and china, because both countries are bound together economically. China needs a big country like USA to exports its goods to, and USA needs the goods. Plus there are many US corporations that (sadly) produce in China.
不管怎么說，美國和中國之間不會(huì)發(fā)生戰(zhàn)爭，因?yàn)閮蓢?jīng)濟(jì)牢不可分。中國需要美國那樣的大國作為龐大出口市場，美國也需要中國的商品。況且，有許多美國公司把生產(chǎn)放在中國。
AYahoo! user
The carrier in the image is roughly the size of a US helicopter carrier (amphibious assault ship). The US has 11 (soon to be 12) super-carriers which are in another league entirely.
圖片上的那艘航母看起來差不多美國直升機(jī)航母那樣大小。美國擁有11艘(很快會(huì)12艘)超級(jí)航母，這些航母完全是不同級(jí)別的。
Dammitdan 2
The interest we are paying on our debt is paying for those carriers.
我們付給中國人的利息被用于為這些航母買單。
Unregulated
Looks like a Carnival Cruise Liner.
看起來就像是嘉年華游輪
GerryW
United States has 10 active carriers and 3 being built right now. We are okay, although we need to keep an eye out for problems on the horizon.
美國有10艘現(xiàn)役航母，還有3艘正在建造，我們已經(jīng)夠用了，不過需要密切注視浮現(xiàn)出來的問題。
George
One carrier is a toy. Two is regular.
一艘航母就是玩具，兩艘才夠格
James
Their first aircraft carrier was bought used from Russia, they fixed it up. This will be their first attempt at building an aircraft carrier.
第一艘航母購自俄羅斯然后翻新的�，F(xiàn)在這艘航母是他們首次嘗試自主建造航母。
P
AIRCRAFT CARRIERS ARE A SITTING DUCK. SUBMARINES ARE NOT.
航母就是活靶子，核潛艇就不會(huì)。
Slowburn
When they have launched all four they will still be inferior in carrier based aviation to one American big deck carrier.
等他們的4艘航母都服役后，也不及美國的一艘超級(jí)航母。
Rocco
People keep forgetting Korean war and Vietnam war. Big boats, big guns, big tanks, big planes don't win a war without sound goal, leadership, logistics, strategy, and warriors.
人們忘記了朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭和越南戰(zhàn)爭。如果缺少堅(jiān)定的目標(biāo)、深謀遠(yuǎn)慮的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)層、穩(wěn)定的后勤保障、行之有效的戰(zhàn)略和驍勇善戰(zhàn)的戰(zhàn)士，單憑堅(jiān)船利炮并不能贏得戰(zhàn)爭。
Dbrain
Who is paying for the Military build-up in China? The United States! Thank you Politicians for selling out our country!
誰在為中國的軍事建設(shè)買單？美國！謝謝政客出賣我們的國家！
cape cod gene
Their first carrier was a retrofitted Soviet ship.This is a brand new one they are building themselves - big difference.
他們的第一艘航母是翻新蘇聯(lián)航母的，現(xiàn)在這艘是全新的，是他們自主建造的，兩者之間的區(qū)別很大。
John Pfeffer
Aircraft carriers are not self defense weapons. They are designed to provide air coverage for any land invasion.
航母不是自衛(wèi)武器，它們被設(shè)計(jì)用來為陸上入侵提供空中保護(hù)。
turbocharged
They have arrived, they have the money, the resources, and the population, and they have no intention of stopping.
他們有的是錢，有的是資源，有的是人，他們不打算停下來。
NoO
Carriers - Difficult and expensive to build, easy and cheap to destroy.
航母造價(jià)昂貴，建造難度大，但是很容易被摧毀，且成本低。
DougZ
I think China is planning something that will make World War ll look like a minor disagreement
我認(rèn)為中國在下一盤大棋，這盤棋會(huì)讓第二次世界大戰(zhàn)相形見絀。
Scott
We will then find out that instead of for aircrafts, these ships are going to be used to as living platforms since their air is so polluted.
我們將會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)他們的航母不是用來搭載戰(zhàn)機(jī)，而是當(dāng)做生活平臺(tái)，因?yàn)樗麄兊目諝馕廴咎珖?yán)重了。
RU4Real
China, the new imperialists on the block...
中國是新的帝國主義者
Rtyrtyrty
Stop buying Made in China. You're funding the Communist war machine
拒絕購買中國貨，否則你們是在為gcd的戰(zhàn)爭機(jī)器提供資金支持。
Jojo The Filipino Clown
I wonder why China not building more? Our treasury annual coupon/interest payment to them is enough to buy 2-3 carriers every year. What is wrong with their priority?
為什么中國不多造一些？我們每年支付給他們的利息就足夠其每年建造2-3艘航母。到底哪里錯(cuò)了？
Against Ignorance
If wee keep buying Chinese goods, and making the Chinese richer and more powerful, we will become an underdog, and are grandchildren will be speaking Chinese.
如果我們繼續(xù)購買中國貨，讓中國人變得更富更強(qiáng)大，我們就會(huì)淪為失敗者，子子孫孫將會(huì)不得不說中文。
Jacob
I think China should worry more about their environmental problems.
我認(rèn)為中國應(yīng)當(dāng)多加擔(dān)心他們的環(huán)境問題。
Bob
China could also be very Friendly. Why would they go to war with the USA, they already control our Economy.
中國也是可以和我們建立友好關(guān)系的，為什么他們要與美國開戰(zhàn)，他們不是已經(jīng)控制了我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)了嗎
Repubs Stink
All the money to build a aircraft carrier and a $5 million dollar missile can take it out.
花這么多錢用來造航母，一枚500萬美元的導(dǎo)彈就可以將其摧毀。
Who cares.
China has their new carrier killing ballistic missiles. They can be launched from a train or what have you and they can hit a carrier. It would take only one.
Hope we have them to.
中國有新的航母殺手锏，這種彈道導(dǎo)彈可以從火車上發(fā)射，然后擊中航母，一枚就夠。
希望我們也有。
Zero Expectation
With plenty of nuclear warheads on both sides, these new ships are just built for attracting the attention of the americans, while the real deadly arena is called economics.
雙方都有大量核彈頭，中國的這些航母是用來吸引美國人的注意力。真正慘烈的競技場叫做經(jīng)濟(jì)。
以下是《印度時(shí)報(bào)》讀者的評(píng)論：
譯文來源：三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/china-building-second-aircraft-carrier.html
Vikwashere (New Delhi)
Problem is China launched two destroyers in the same amount of time india is building one.Chinese shipbuilding is much faster than india .While china first carrier is foreign after using experience gained from this no doubt china will build more carriers.China is aiming for the US so while they may not catch up in reality they'll still end up with impressive capability
中國造兩艘驅(qū)逐艦的時(shí)間，印度只能造一艘。中國造船的速度比印度快多了。中國第一艘航母購買自國外，獲得操作航母的經(jīng)驗(yàn)后，中國肯定會(huì)造更多航母。中國的目標(biāo)是美國，他們也許趕不上來，但是最終會(huì)獲得傲人的能力。
bodysurfer1111 ()
China did NOT BUILD its current and only aircraft carrier . It was built in Ukraine and sold 2nd -hand to China which retrofitted it . It is an antique with a curved flight deck .
中國第一艘航母不是自己造的。而是烏克蘭造的，然后當(dāng)做二手貨賣給中國去翻新。它是個(gè)古董，甲板是滑躍式的。
Jupitor Chakma (Agartala)
Aim of China seems to be as close to USA as possible militarily, although it can not overtake USA in near future.
Agree (2)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)
中國的目標(biāo)似乎是軍事上盡量接近美國，雖然在不久的將來無法完成超越。
hazrat adam (Umriak)
I do not think that China has any designs on other countries, however, it has a right to take the territories that others have taken. China is the most powerful country except the US, China should have a 600 ship navy, with some 20 aircraft carrier battle groups, China can afford it and can do it. However India should know it's place, feed your poor, and stop taking handouts and aid from others, stop day dreaming about trying to compete with China.
Agree (0)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)
我認(rèn)為中國對(duì)其他國家并無企圖。然而，它有權(quán)利要回被別人占領(lǐng)的領(lǐng)土。中國是僅次于美國的最強(qiáng)大國家，應(yīng)該建立一支600艘軍艦組成的海軍，其中包括20個(gè)航母戰(zhàn)斗群，中國負(fù)擔(dān)得起，也辦得到。而印度應(yīng)該清楚自身位置，先養(yǎng)活窮人，別接受其他國家的施舍，別做白日夢，別天真地試圖和中國競爭。
MadeInIndia (India) replies to hazrat adam
Rubish, India is a superpower already.
Agree (0)Disagree (3)Recommend (0)
垃圾，印度已經(jīng)是超級(jí)大國了。
Das (Pune) replies to MadeInIndia
Yes, India has become the superpower of Rape.
Agree (2)Disagree (0)
是的，印度已經(jīng)成為強(qiáng)奸超級(jí)大國了。
MadeInIndia replies to Das
Whats wrong with that? Rape is not a crime, it's a suprise sex, it's a game!
那樣有錯(cuò)嗎？強(qiáng)奸不是犯罪，而是驚奇的性愛，是一種游戲！
Alakesh Upadhyaya upadhyaya ()
India needs more than 10 nuclear subs, 5 super carrier, stealth frigates and destroyer.
印度需要10幾艘核潛艇，還有超級(jí)航母，隱形護(hù)衛(wèi)艦和驅(qū)逐艦。
npk (bangalore) replies to Alakesh Upadhyaya upadhyaya
great calculation...but all of those need money and operation skill and proper learning to drive them..oops forgot to mention boldness has to be there
Agree (1)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)
真是深謀遠(yuǎn)慮啊，不過需要很多錢，還要操作技能，人員訓(xùn)練等，噗，忘記提還需要膽量了。
Alakesh Upadhyaya upadhyaya ()
China wants to catchup with the United States. China will plan to build more than 4. China will do anything to become the no 1 super power. China may not show her development before the world but has a long plan of expanding its territory. India must work on at least 3 super carriers to counter China soon.
中國想要趕上美國，計(jì)劃建造4艘以上航母。中國會(huì)想方設(shè)法成為頭號(hào)超級(jí)大國，也許不會(huì)向世界炫耀其發(fā)展，不過有一個(gè)開疆?dāng)U土的長期計(jì)劃。為了反擊中國，印度至少得造3艘超級(jí)航母。
MadeInIndia (India) replies to Alakesh Upadhyaya upadhyaya
Don't worry brother, when the time comes, we can buy them, as many as we like!
Agree (0)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)
哥們，別擔(dān)心，到時(shí)候我們可以選擇購買，要多少買多少！
Alakesh Upadhyaya upadhyaya (Tezpur, Assam) replies to California
You know India has been always dependent on future weapons. We are unable to proceed as we planned. India policymakers needs to rethink about India military modernization. China will crush us like 1962 if we don't realize now.
印度一直以來依賴外國提供武器，我們無力按計(jì)劃推進(jìn)武器的研發(fā)。印度決策者應(yīng)當(dāng)重新思考印度的軍事現(xiàn)代化，再不認(rèn)識(shí)到這點(diǎn)，中國將會(huì)像1962年時(shí)那樣粉碎我們。
npk (bangalore) replies to Alakesh Upadhyaya upadhyaya
100% u r right...they make and plan and work according to the plan...they are not lazy gooze...the other frame i like from your comment is "China may not show her development" this is true they never ever boast they just act...only Big mouthed and empty vessel will make more noise...they are like isrealites...just act
Agree (1)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)
100%正確，他們制定計(jì)劃，然后按計(jì)劃推進(jìn)，不會(huì)懶惰成性....
你留言中讓我們喜歡的另一點(diǎn)是，“中國也許不會(huì)炫耀其發(fā)展” 。這是真的，他們從不吹噓，而是埋頭苦干。滿瓶子不響，半瓶子哐當(dāng)。
gear (mumbai)
soon china would have more aircraft carrires than India
Agree (1)Disagree (1)Recommend (0)
中國擁有的航母很快會(huì)比印度更多
gear (mumbai)
very fast job , compared to India
Agree (1)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)
跟印度比起來，中國的速度快多了
California (California) replies to gear
You must remember that China reverse engineers Russian design and hacks American designs so the fact it even has the blue prints shows it likely did both. India plays by international rules unlike them so of course it'd take India longer to do things the right way. Second, they do it to show themselves 'stabilizing' the region against Western aggression and to show power against India itself. I think India should at least match what China is doing so India has an even shot against China. Their history proves they are feeble but aggressive when they dont get their way and India needs to be prepared.
首先，中國對(duì)俄羅斯的航母進(jìn)行逆向工程研究，偷竊美國的設(shè)計(jì)，而印度是按照國際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來辦事，當(dāng)然花的時(shí)間要更多了。其次，他們?cè)谧C明自己是在“穩(wěn)定”這一地區(qū)，反對(duì)西方的入侵，同時(shí)向印度炫耀力量。
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:08
美帝雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)喊得真響
都不準(zhǔn)備藏了
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:08
看評(píng)論感覺各國的網(wǎng)民都差不多，都是各種酸....
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:11
The Chinese don't need aircraft carriers to attack the US, they have Wal-Mart and Obama.
中國人不需要航母來向美國發(fā)起進(jìn)攻，他們有沃爾瑪和奧巴馬就可以。
第一個(gè)就是這個(gè)……
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:11
MadeInIndia replies to Das
Whats wrong with that? Rape is not a crime, it's a suprise sex, it's a game!
那樣有錯(cuò)嗎？強(qiáng)奸不是犯罪，而是驚奇的性愛，是一種游戲！
看到這里我服了！
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:12
Reply to Reply Post by firewraith (2014-01-20 23:08)
隨便抓著點(diǎn)啥然后往死了黑現(xiàn)政府
這點(diǎn)全世界都一樣
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:12
Whats wrong with that? Rape is not a crime, it's a suprise sex, it's a game!
那樣有錯(cuò)嗎？強(qiáng)奸不是犯罪，而是驚奇的性愛，是一種游戲！
...............怪不得阿三強(qiáng)奸那么多
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:13
沃爾瑪和奧巴馬的吐槽殺傷力好大
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:14
Whats wrong with that? Rape is not a crime, it's a suprise sex, it's a game!
那樣有錯(cuò)嗎？強(qiáng)奸不是犯罪，而是驚奇的性愛，是一種游戲！
我就看到這一句，沒啥可以吐槽了
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:15
Reply Post by 雞蛋番茄 (2014-01-20 23:11):
The Chinese don't need aircraft carriers to attack the US, they have Wal-Mart and Obama.
中國......
這言論在某論壇早就被塞抹布了吧
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:15
We will then find out that instead of for aircrafts, these ships are going to be used to as living platforms since their air is so polluted.
我們將會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)他們的航母不是用來搭載戰(zhàn)機(jī)，而是當(dāng)做生活平臺(tái)，因?yàn)樗麄兊目諝馕廴咎珖?yán)重了。
說了實(shí)話···
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:16
觀海已經(jīng)徹底暴露了
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:17
Reply Post by 十里良民 (2014-01-20 23:11):
MadeInIndia replies to Das
Whats wrong with that? Rape is not a crime, it's a suprise sex, ......
對(duì)這種印度人只能呵呵了，真該人道毀滅
網(wǎng)友評(píng)論2014-01-20 23:18
Yes, India has become the superpower of Rape.
Agree (2)Disagree (0)
觀海已經(jīng)徹底暴露了
